The 3.8 million "Waspi women" who were informed that they would need to work for a further five years in order to earn their pension would not receive any money from the government, according to Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall. In opposition, prominent Labour figures such as Sir Keir Starmer, Rachel Reeves, Angela Rayner, and Ms. Kendall supported the women's movement.In 2022, Sir Keir signed a promise demanding "fair and fast" compensation for the impacted women. He claimed they had experienced a great injustice last year. However, the Prime Minister stated yesterday that the Government could not afford the anticipated ÂŁ10.5 billion cost, which would have resulted in a possible ÂŁ3,000 settlement for each of the nearly 3 million impacted.anger with Angela Madden, chairman of the Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) group, describing it as an âinsultâ.
In the Commons, Ms Kendall faced a backlash from Labour MPs and cries of âshameâ.
Labour MP Brian Leishman said he was âappalledâ by the decision, telling Ms Kendall: âWaspi women certainly do not need words of disappointment and they certainly do not need hollow statements. What they need is justice.âTory pensions spokesman Helen Whately said it was âno surpriseâ Labour had broken its pre-election pledges to the Waspi women.âYet again, they said one thing to get elected and are now doing another,â she said.
âJust like they had âno plansâ to take the winter fuel payment from 10million pensioners. They shouldnât expect to get away with this hypocrisy.â
Meanwhile former pensions minister Ros Altmann accused ministers of turning their backs on older people, adding: âIt has been clear there is little sympathy for pensioners, who are simply not a priority for public spending.â
Campaigners, led by the Waspi group, argued millions of women born in the 1950s affected by the changes were required to rethink their retirement plans at relatively short notice and suffered financial hardship.
The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) suggested that compensation ranging between ÂŁ1,000 and ÂŁ2,950, could be appropriate for each of those affected.
But Ms Kendall said a flat rate compensation scheme would not be âa fair or proportionate use of taxpayersâ moneyâ.
And she said designing a bespoke scheme to help those worst affected would impose a âsignificant cost and administrative burdenâ on her department. The Prime Minister backed the decision, saying: âI do understand, of course, the concern of the Waspi women. But also I have to take into account whether itâs right at the moment to impose a further burden on the taxpayer, which is what it would be.âMs Madden, who has campaigned for justice for the Waspi women for years, said: âThis is a bizarre and totally unjustified move which will leave everyone asking what the point of an ombudsman is if ministers can simply ignore their decisions.â Stephen Flynn, the SNPâs leader at Westminster, described Labourâs U-turn as âshamelessâ, adding: âWhen it was politically convenient to do so, Labour backed the Waspi women. Today, they have chosen to betray them.â
In opposition, Labour were relentless in exploiting the Waspi campaign.
Ms Kendall describes herself on her own website as a âlong-standing supporterâ.
At the 2019 election, the party committed itself to paying billions of pounds in compensation. At the time Angela Rayner, now the deputy prime minister, said: âAny government should act responsibly to these women.â
Sources-Daily Mail