A left-wing activist who attacked a white Muslim man she wrongly believed to be a racist during a pro-immigration protest shortly after the Southport stabbings has avoided a prison sentence, sparking allegations of a 'two-tier justice system.'
Caroline Leneghan, a former NHS nurse, snatched an iPhone from Dylan Fontaine and smashed it during a heated confrontation at the Bournemouth demonstration. When Fontaine tried to retrieve the phone, she lunged at him physically.
Leneghan, 43, accused Fontaineâwho is actually a Muslim convert supporting asylum seekersâof being a racist and a fascist based solely on his appearance. Her outburst prompted others at the protest to surround him, causing him to fear for his safety.
The demonstration took place in the tense atmosphere following the Southport murders, a period marked by far-right attacks on mosques and asylum seeker accommodations, fueled by false claims that the attacker, Axel Rudakubana, was a Muslim asylum seeker.
Despite denying assault and criminal damage, Leneghanâwho displays the Palestinian flag on her Facebook profileâwas found guilty at trial.
Caroline Leneghan had earlier been cautioned by magistrates that her actions would be viewed within the broader context of the widespread unrest that followed the murders of three girls at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport last summer.
Despite showing no remorse for her actions, Leneghan avoided jail time and was instead handed a six-month prison sentence, suspended for two years. District Judge Orla Austin stated that Leneghanâs 20-week pregnancy was the sole reason she was not immediately imprisoned.
Her lenient sentencing has drawn sharp comparisons with the harsher penalties handed to right-wing demonstrators involved in anti-immigration protests after the Southport incident. Among them was Lucy Connolly, a childminder from Northampton and wife of a Conservative councillor, who received a 31-month prison term for a tweet deemed to incite racial hatred on the night of the Southport murders.
This controversy comes just days after a Home Affairs Select Committee report concluded that there was no evidence of âtwo-tier policingâ in relation to the civil unrest that swept the country following last summerâs Southport murders.
During her hearing at Poole Magistratesâ Court, it was revealed that Leneghan attended a pro-immigration rally outside the Roundhouse Hotel in Bournemouth on August 7. The hotel, which accommodates asylum seekers, was believed to be a potential flashpoint for tensions, possibly attracting anti-immigration protesters.
Leneghan told the court she was representing the âDorset Palestine Solidarity Campaignâ and believed there was a âcrossoverâ between Palestinian causes and the struggles faced by asylum seekers.
However, prosecutors said she took it upon herself to police the rally, deciding who belonged and who didnât. She wrongly identified Dylan Fontaine and his brother Steven as far-right agitators, despite both men being practicing Muslims who had turned up to support asylum seekers.
The court was told that Leneghanâs actions were not only misguided but also dangerous, resulting in an aggressive confrontation that led to physical assault and damage to property.
Victoria Hill, prosecuting, told the court: âThe victim attended the protest with his brother and was on the same side of the road as the defendant. Leneghan took issue with their presence, insisting they didnât belong there and should move to the other side of the demonstration.â
Hill explained that due to Leneghanâs aggressive behaviour and inflammatory remarks, Dylan Fontaine began recording her on his phoneâjust as he had been filming other parts of the protest. While Mr. Fontaine sustained no physical injuries, his phone was damaged, with its back visibly smashed and cracked.
The court also heard that Leneghan was âsomewhat evasiveâ during her interactions with police and had changed aspects of her appearance, including her clothing, before being questioned.
Steven Fontaine, 29, gave evidence in support of his brother, recounting the incident: âShe told us, âYou donât belong here, you should be on the other side, youâre racist.â She was completely franticâgoing mad. Then she shouted, âTheyâre racist!â and suddenly everyone turned and swarmed my brother. I asked her, âWhat makes you think that?ââ
Steven Fontaine testified that Leneghan had effectively told them they âwerenât Muslim,â based on their appearance. âShe was basically saying, âYouâre not Muslim, judging by what youâre wearing,ââ he said. âThere were people in balaclavas, and she wasnât saying anything to themâit was purely based on how we looked. She decided I didnât fit the image of a âtypicalâ Muslim.â
He explained that Leneghan had been âloiteringâ near them for some time, prompting his younger brother Dylan, 28, to begin filming her due to the rising hostility.
âTensions were high,â Steven told the court. âI was being shouted at and called a racist. Someone grabbed me, others were pulling at meâit was chaos. Thankfully, there were a few people there who knew me and managed to calm things down. If I hadnât known anyone, it couldâve ended much worse.â
Courtroom footage played during the trial captured Leneghan confronting Dylan Fontaine, saying: âYou clearly donât belong here,â âYouâre looking very suspicious,â and âI donât think youâre one of us.â Dylan responded by asking, âWhy are you assuming my beliefs?â to which Leneghan replied, âBecause I can tell from looking at youâthe clothes, for a start.â
At the time, Mr. Fontaine was dressed in grey shorts, a black top, and a capâclothing Leneghan evidently used as the basis for her assumptions.
In a second video shown to the court, Caroline Leneghan is heard escalating the confrontation by shouting, "He's a fascist, you both are... Why don't you go back over there?" while pointing toward a small group on the opposite side of the street, believed to be far-right protesters.
Moments later, Leneghan snatched Dylan Fontaineâs iPhone from him and hurled it to the ground, smashing the device. When Fontaine tried to retrieve it, she attempted to block him and âlungedâ at him repeatedly before yelling, âHeâs a racist, get him!ââwords that prompted others to swarm around him.
After the incident, Leneghan refused to give police her details and attempted to evade officers by changing her clothing. She eventually complied and provided her information.
Although Mr. Fontaine was not physically harmed, he told the court the ordeal left him feeling âsick.â He initially chose not to file a formal complaint but later changed his mind after reflecting on what had occurred.
In her defense, Leneghan claimed that the Fontaine brothers âstood outâ and appeared suspicious because they were keeping to themselves at the protest.
âThey didnât look like they were trying to be part of our group,â Caroline Leneghan told the court, justifying her actions based on the Fontaine brothersâ appearance and demeanor.
Her defence barrister, Ewa Russell, acknowledged the seriousness of the incident, stating: âWithout a shadow of a doubt, the matter is aggravated by the circumstances. However, given her personal situation, this should not warrant a custodial sentence.â Russell added that Leneghan expressed some regret, saying that in hindsight, she should have simply walked away.
In delivering the sentence, District Judge Orla Austin strongly condemned Leneghanâs conduct: âThis was a disgraceful incident committed in the midst of national turmoil. You called the victims fascists and racists based solely on how they looked, and your actions endangered Mr Fontaine by inciting others to turn on him. I donât accept that youâve shown any genuine remorse or fully grasped the seriousness of your actions.â
The judge confirmed the offence merited the maximum sentence of 26 weeks in prison. However, she cited Leneghanâs 20-week pregnancyâspecifically concerns around pre-eclampsiaâas a mitigating factor and opted to suspend the sentence for two years.
As part of the sentence, Leneghan is now prohibited from attending any protests, demonstrations, or assembled gatherings for the same two-year period. She was also ordered to pay ÂŁ300 in compensation to Mr Fontaine, along with ÂŁ200 in court costs and a ÂŁ154 victim surcharge.